Talk:Giles Hill: Difference between revisions
From Compendum Caidis
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The information was removed by request as it might have interfered with his modern life. Besides, these pages are supposed to be for fun and not show negatives about people | The information was removed by request as it might have interfered with his modern life. Besides, these pages are supposed to be for fun and not show negatives about people. | ||
*While I would hate to see anything really malicious on the Wiki, I also think it should reflect our history which may at times touch on subjects that are not just for fun. Other pages give similiar types of information. I don't think we should white-wash our history. [[User:Aliskye|Aliskye]] 11:14, 7 July 2010 (PDT) | *While I would hate to see anything really malicious on the Wiki, I also think it should reflect our history which may at times touch on subjects that are not just for fun. Other pages give similiar types of information. I don't think we should white-wash our history. [[User:Aliskye|Aliskye]] 11:14, 7 July 2010 (PDT) | ||
*UPDATE: The information has been removed pending clarification of the policies from Society. | |||
Revision as of 00:28, 8 July 2010
The information was removed by request as it might have interfered with his modern life. Besides, these pages are supposed to be for fun and not show negatives about people.
- While I would hate to see anything really malicious on the Wiki, I also think it should reflect our history which may at times touch on subjects that are not just for fun. Other pages give similiar types of information. I don't think we should white-wash our history. Aliskye 11:14, 7 July 2010 (PDT)
- UPDATE: The information has been removed pending clarification of the policies from Society.
