Talk:Right Noble: Difference between revisions
From Compendum Caidis
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: I think that the previous edit's "Recipients" is a better description of the class of right noble guilds than "Members". The guilds are not members of the Order of Right Noble. An even bet...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think that the previous edit's "Recipients" is a better description of the class of right noble guilds than "Members". The guilds are not members of the Order of Right Noble. An even better subheading _might_ be "Guilds honored"?--[[User:Lachlan|Lachlan]] 11:13, 6 November 2008 (PST) | I think that the previous edit's "Recipients" is a better description of the class of right noble guilds than "Members". The guilds are not members of the Order of Right Noble. An even better subheading _might_ be "Guilds honored"?--[[User:Lachlan|Lachlan]] 11:13, 6 November 2008 (PST) | ||
** The current version says recipients now... The draft you saw was me accidentally copy and pasting the wrong word in. If you want to change the nomenclature, go for! --[[User:Kottr|Kolfinna]] 13:30, 6 November 2008 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 6 November 2008
I think that the previous edit's "Recipients" is a better description of the class of right noble guilds than "Members". The guilds are not members of the Order of Right Noble. An even better subheading _might_ be "Guilds honored"?--Lachlan 11:13, 6 November 2008 (PST)
- The current version says recipients now... The draft you saw was me accidentally copy and pasting the wrong word in. If you want to change the nomenclature, go for! --Kolfinna 13:30, 6 November 2008 (PST)
